States and Countries Banning the Sale of Fossil Ivory and Proposed Legislation
Poachers have long sought out elephants for their ivory tusks. Because of the ecological and moral problems this poses, many countries have banned the import of modern ivory. In response, some smugglers began marking shipments of modern ivory as fossil ivory. In the United States, this led to several state legislatures submitting bills to ban the sale of all ivory, both modern and fossil.
The differences between extant elephant ivory and mammoth ivory have been recognized for some time. Even if a mammoth tusk is well-preserved, it curves much more dramatically than an extant elephant's. Mammoth tusks also have a distinct internal structure, with cross-hatchings (also called Schreger lines) intersecting at a 90° angle compared to extant elephants 115°. Laser-based Raman spectroscopy has identified chemical differences as well. For a general guide to identifying different types of ivory, please refer to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species' Identification Guide for Ivory and Ivory Substitutes.
Despite these differences, some state legislatures have elected to ban all types of ivory. While this is undoubtedly less labor-intensive than attempting to identify every individual piece of ivory that passes into a given state's borders, it also makes the acquisition of fossil ivory for artisans, museums, businesses, collectors, and indigenous peoples more difficult than it ought to be.
In order to keep stakeholders apprised of ongoing developments, JPS has provided a list of states that have enacted or are in the process of enacting ivory bans. While non-exhaustive, JPS staff update this list on a regular basis.
The following states have proposed legislation in process. If and when bills are signed into law, we will update the links. NOTE: While we make every attempt to locate the current legislation regarding fossil Ivory, new bills and current legislation is not always easily found. You must check with your own state legislators to see if there are additional proposed bans or bills that have passed.
UPDATES
1. Arkansas; Senate Bill 928 (Killed in Committee)
2. Connecticut; Proposed Bill No. 5700 (Vague definition of Ivory), Tabled for the Calendar, House May 5, 2015. Legislative Link
3. Florida; Senate Bill 1120 (Includes Mammoth Ivory), Died in Environmental Preservation and Conservation Location: In committee/council (EP), May 1, 2015. Legislative Link
4. Illinois; Senate Bill 1858 (Includes Mammoth Ivory), Currently in Committee, May 15, 2015 Legislative Link
5. Iowa; SF 30 (Includes Mammoth Ivory) In Sub-committee February 11, 2015 Legislative Link
6. Maryland; House Bill 713 (Vague definition of Ivory), Unfavorable Report by Judiciary, remains in Committee, March 16, 2015 Legislative Link
7. Massachusetts; Senate Bill S.2575 (Includes Mammoth Ivory) Remains in Committee June 25, 2018. Legislative Link
8. Oklahoma; HB1787 (Vague definition of Ivory), Second Reading referred to Wildlife Committee February 3, 2015 Legislative Link
9. Rhode Island; House 5660 (Includes Mammoth Ivory) Committee recommended measure be held for further study, April 15, 2015 Legislative Link
10. Vermont; House 297 (Includes Mammoth Ivory), In Committee February 24, 2015 Legislative Link
11. Delaware; Senate Bill 156 (Includes Mammoth Ivory) Senate Banking and Business Committee June 24, 2015. Legislative Link
12. Michigan; Senate Bill 371 (Includes Mammoth Ivory) REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES June 4, 2015 See also House Bill 4509 Legilative Link
|